| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test devDependencies in the main package were incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Kristóf Marussy <kristof@marussy.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #5
Signed-off-by: Kristóf Marussy <kristof@marussy.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Requires some workarounds for ts-jest to find the vendored dependencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Changed jest to run from the root package and reference the packages
as projects. This required moving the base jest config file away from
the project root.
- Module isolation seems to prevent ts-jest from loading the shared
package, so we disabled it for now.
- To better facilitate mocking, services should be split into interfaces
and implementation
- Had to downgrade to chald 4.1.2 as per
https://github.com/chalk/chalk/releases/tag/v5.0.0 at least until
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/46452 is resolved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now we can run with ESM at build and test time and transpile into
commonjs for electron. This greatly simplifies testing, since we treat
everything as ESM during build with esbuild anyways. Now the test
environment and the build scripts match the apparent (but not the actual
for the main, preload, and inject modules) runtime environment.
Caveats:
- We may use top-level async expressions in tests and script, but not in
code that gets transpiled into commonjs or scripts that get imported
by vite. The limitation w.r.t. commonjs seems fundamental.
- Jest only experimentally supports ESM and there are some limitations
with mocking. Most limitations (except the lack of automatic mocks)
can be worked around by async importing code that uses mocks.
- There are packages marked as modules (so that node reads any scripts
in them as ESM) that nevertheless get transpiled into commonjs
modules. However, these should be clearly marked by using a .cjs
extension as their bundle. The worst offender is the root package,
which has a .cjs as its main entry point that gets read by electron,
but is in fact marked as a module. This doesn't seem to bother electron
at all. The service-inject package is an IIFE with a .js extension,
but it outputs a fully self-contained bundle, so the choice of module
format should be irrelevant.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We will build all packages except the frontend (where vite remains in
use) with esbuild.
For some reason, the @yarnpkg/esbuild-plugin-pnp doesn't allow esbuild
to load esm modules and we fall back to commonjs for dependencies.
Hence we had to switch back to node_modules (but still rely on yarn
hardlinking for a more efficient install).
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 5c38af061348ec604337280009775832edc66270.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The architecture in the main process is split into 3 main parts:
* services: interfaces for services are injected into the stores through
the MainEnv interface (for testability)
* services/impl: electron-specific implementations of services
* stores: the actions of the stores can invoke (asynchronous) services
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moves all typings to the dist-types directories from the dist
directories so that we can let vite clean the dist directories on build
without clobbering the typings generated by tsc.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patches are send in one direction only, from the main to the renderer,
so all actions have to go through the context bridge and the renderer
IPC to modify the store in the renderer. This makes the store in the
main process a single source of truth, which simplifies debugging and
state persistence.
The store in the renderer is connected to redux devtools for inspection,
but playing back the state in the devtools won't change the sotre in
main process.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Project skeleton based on
https://github.com/cawa-93/vite-electron-builder
but we use react instead of vue and yarn instead of npm.
|